When I say “captured,” I of course mean in the photographic sense. Alas, photos and plaster casts of footprints, and hair samples of dubious distinction, are all we have in the way of evidence for the existence of Bigfoot. It’s likely all we’ll ever have. I theorize that if such a creature as Bigfoot does exist, in defiance of all scientific probability, then it is more than just an animal. There must be something mystical about these creatures, for them to have escaped detection by the world at large. Even so, it does seem, if one can maintain an open-enough mind, that there have been instances where a Bigfoot—there has to be more than just one, mystical monster or no—has left behind a trace amount of evidence as to its existence. Is this such a case?
A camera set up in an eagle’s nest in Michigan snapped some footage of a Bigfoot. Or a bear. If there are bears in that area, that is. Or it could be a man. Or a man dressed in a gorilla suit, playing a prank. Seems like a lot of trouble to go to for a prank, though. I’d say it was just a tree stump, except that it is seen moving and appears to be bipedal. Hey, this WAS in Michigan—maybe it’s the DOGMAN!